🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 754+ reviews
Booksβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

essential of biological anthropology

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.4 out of 5(754 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$33.39
$55.65
Sale
βœ“ on the house distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Used, still good, 4th edition

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift Shipping
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

essential of biological anthropology

Used, still good, 4th edition

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Books products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2098159

Category: Books > Reference Books > Textbooks

Original Price:$55.65 USD

Sale Price:$33.39 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ on the house fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8322 reviews
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Worth every penny
Good fit and finish essential of biological anthropology.
45 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Really marvelous
magnificent price for such a quality essential of biological anthropology.
25 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
impeccable for my needs
From my experience, the essential of biological anthropology works fine and it works for me.
50 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Worth every penny
I’ve had no issues with the essential of biological anthropology yet.
11 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptional essential of biological anthropology!
The essential of biological anthropology looks straightforward, but functionally it’s fine.
39 people found this helpful