🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 280+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

OLIVIA PANT - Trousers

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.1 out of 5(280 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$126
$210
Sale
βœ“ on the house distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : NormalPattern : PlainDetails : Elasticated waistArticle number : R0721A02H-Q11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift Shipping
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

OLIVIA PANT - Trousers

Rise : Normal
Pattern : Plain
Details : Elasticated waist
Article number : R0721A02H-Q11

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1230577

Category: Women > Clothing > Trousers

Original Price:$210 USD

Sale Price:$126 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ on the house fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8126 reviews
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly what I needed
Quality is okay for the price. The OLIVIA PANT - Trousers works fine.
4 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark
1 month ago Β· Baltimore, MD
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely flawless
The OLIVIA PANT - Trousers fits my expectations.
25 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase 
5 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
appreciate love love!
To be fair, the OLIVIA PANT - Trousers works well enough and I don’t regret it. No setup issues.
7 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superior
For the price, the OLIVIA PANT - Trousers performs as expected and I’m satisfied.
42 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Fort Worth, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
appreciate it!
From my experience, the OLIVIA PANT - Trousers works well enough and it’s fine overall.
43 people found this helpful