🚚 FREE SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 423+ reviews
Women āœ“ In Stock šŸ”„ Bestseller

304 Stainless Steel 18K Gold Plated Minimalist Commute Plating Cross Open Ring

ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜… 4.2 out of 5 (423 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$8.4
$14
Sale
āœ“ Free shipping on this item • Limited time offer

None

šŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
Fast Shipping
ā†©ļø
Easy Returns

šŸ“‹ Product Description

304 Stainless Steel 18K Gold Plated Minimalist Commute Plating Cross Open Ring

None

This product is perfect for anyone looking for quality Women products.

šŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 980686

Category: Women > Jewelry >

Original Price: $14 USD

Sale Price: $8.4 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand New

🚚 Shipping & Returns

āœ“ FREE Shipping on orders over $50

Standard Delivery: 3-5 business days

Express Delivery: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Based on 423 reviews
EY
Elizabeth Young āœ“ Verified
1 month ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Highly Recommend 304 Stainless Steel 18K Gold Plated Minimalist Commute Plating Cross Open Ring
Very pleased with the 304 Stainless Steel 18K Gold Plated Minimalist Commute Plating Cross Open Ring.
AC
Amber Carter āœ“ Verified
2 weeks ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Highly Recommend 304 Stainless Steel 18K Gold Plated Minimalist Commute Plating Cross Open Ring
The 304 Stainless Steel 18K Gold Plated Minimalist Commute Plating Cross Open Ring arrived clean.
BW
Brandon Wright āœ“ Verified
2 weeks ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Exactly What I Needed
I’m okay with this purchase.
LN
Lauren Nelson āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Best Purchase Ever
Bought this 304 Stainless Steel 18K Gold Plated Minimalist Commute Plating Cross Open Ring as a gift and it was a hit.
BT
Brittany Turner āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Highly Recommend 304 Stainless Steel 18K Gold Plated Minimalist Commute Plating Cross Open Ring
The 304 Stainless Steel 18K Gold Plated Minimalist Commute Plating Cross Open Ring is smaller than I expected, but still usable.